Cookies on this site
Strictly necessary cookies keep the site working. Our analytics and advertising tags — Microsoft Clarity and Google Tag Manager — stay switched off, and write no cookie, until you accept them. Privacy Policy
Cookie preferences
Choose which categories may run. Your choice is stored on this device and is remembered for six months. You can change it at any time from the “Cookie preferences” link in the footer.
Security, session integrity, your light/dark theme choice, and this cookie preference itself. The site cannot work without these, so they cannot be switched off.
Microsoft Clarity (session replay and heatmaps) and Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager. Used to see which pages help and which confuse. Off by default.
Google advertising tags via Google Tag Manager, used to measure which campaigns lead to a demo booking and to show relevant ads. Off by default.
AI recruiting software applies machine learning to sourcing, screening, scheduling or interview analysis. The category splits into tools that add AI features to an existing applicant tracking system and platforms built around it. Which you need depends on whether your bottleneck is finding candidates, reviewing them, or coordinating the people who decide.
Almost every recruiting product now describes itself as AI-powered, which makes the label useless for choosing between them. The question worth asking is narrower: which specific step in your hiring process is slow, and does this tool remove work from that step or somewhere else. A sourcing engine will not help a team drowning in scheduling, and an interview-analysis tool will not fill an empty pipeline. Pitch N Hire builds in this category, so treat this page as a vendor's map of the landscape rather than a neutral ranking, and verify anything that would change your shortlist.
This page is published by Pitch N Hire, which sells an applicant tracking system and therefore competes with the products below. So it is not a ranking: there is no score, no rating and no number one. Options are grouped by who they suit, drawn from our own product comparisons, and each links to the full comparison so you can read the trade-offs rather than take a verdict on trust. Pricing changes constantly and is usually negotiated, so none is quoted here — get a written quote for your seat count.
Deciding the criteria before you look at vendors is what stops a demo deciding for you.
Sourcing, screening, coordination and decision-making fail in different ways and are fixed by different products. Before comparing feature lists, measure where candidates spend the longest waiting. Teams routinely buy a sourcing tool when their real problem is that hiring managers take nine days to give feedback, and the software cannot fix that.
If a model ranks or filters people, someone will eventually ask why. Jurisdictions differ and rules are changing, so confirm what your own counsel requires. Practically, ask whether the vendor can show the factors behind a score, whether you can audit past decisions, and whether a human can override one and have that recorded.
A model that learns from your historical hiring decisions will reproduce your historical hiring patterns, including the ones you are trying to change. Ask whether the system is trained on your data, the vendor's aggregate data, or a general-purpose model, and what happens to your data if you leave.
This determines the real cost. A platform that replaces your applicant tracking system means a migration and retraining; a layer that integrates means a second subscription and two systems that can disagree about candidate status. Neither is wrong, but the price you are quoted rarely reflects which one you are buying.
AI tooling earns its keep at the extremes, not on an average Tuesday. Ask what the product does with two thousand applications arriving in a weekend, and whether any part of the workflow still requires a person to act before candidates hear anything.
Want to test one on a real role before you shortlist?
Free 1-user plan · No credit card
Feature detail only — there is no score, no rating and no rank in this table. Every value is lifted from our own comparison page for that product.
| Product | Free plan | Pricing model | Target company size | Candidate sourcing | AI interviewing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gem | No free tier; demo on request | Quote-based pricing arranged through sales; no public rate card | Mid-market to enterprise talent teams | Core strength — outbound sourcing, passive-candidate discovery, and email sequences | None — Gem is a CRM/sourcing layer and does not run interviews |
| hireEZ | No free plan; contact sales for a demo | Custom quote-based pricing set through sales | Mid-market to large enterprise | Core strength — AI search and engagement of passive candidates across the web | Not an interview tool — hireEZ stops at sourcing and engagement |
| Eightfold | No free plan; enterprise demo on request | Custom quote-based enterprise pricing | Large enterprise and global organisations | Core strength — AI-driven sourcing and talent-pool matching across external and internal talent | Centred on AI matching and screening rather than native video interviewing |
| Phenom | No free plan; enterprise demo on request | Custom quote-based enterprise pricing | Large enterprise employers | CRM, talent marketing, and career-site capture to build and nurture talent pipelines | AI across career site, chatbot, and recommendations; no native async AI video interview product |
| HireVue | No free plan; demo arranged on request | Quote-based enterprise pricing negotiated with sales | Large enterprise and high-volume employers | Not a sourcing tool; focuses on screening and assessment | AI-assisted interviews plus a broad assessment library — a core strength |
| Talview | No public free plan; pricing arranged through sales | Custom, quote-based pricing scaled to volume and modules | Mid-market, enterprise, and education institutions | Not a sourcing tool; focused on interviewing, assessment, and proctoring | Core strength — async and live AI interviews plus assessments and proctoring |
| Manatal | No standing free tier; time-limited free trial | Accessible per-user monthly subscription; free trial | SMBs and recruitment agencies | Candidate enrichment, social-media sourcing, and resume parsing | AI candidate recommendations and scoring; no native async AI video interview product |
| Ashby | No standing free tier; demo / trial via sales | Quote-based; bundled all-in-one, premium positioning | Scaleups and larger high-growth companies | Native CRM and sourcing for outbound pipeline building | Strong structured interview and scorecard tooling; less focus on native AI video |
Best AI Recruiting Software: Free plan, Pricing model, Target company size, Candidate sourcing, AI interviewing for Gem, hireEZ, Eightfold, Phenom, HireVue, Talview, Manatal, Ashby. Feature detail only, with no score, rating or ranking. A dash means that value is not published in our comparison for that product.
Pitch N Hire is not a row in this table: we publish this page, so putting our own product in it would not tell you anything you could check. The free 1-user plan is there to test instead.
Best for: In-house teams that want sourcing, CRM and pipeline in one AI-first system rather than an ATS with AI added afterwards
Best for: Outbound-heavy teams whose bottleneck is finding and contacting passive candidates rather than processing inbound applications
Best for: Large organisations that also need internal mobility and skills mapping across an existing workforce, not only external hiring
Best for: Employers whose career site and candidate experience are the weak link, and who want personalisation before the application starts
Best for: High-volume hiring where structured, recorded interviews and assessment at scale are the constraint
Best for: Teams that need proctored assessment and interview integrity alongside remote screening
Best for: Smaller teams and agencies wanting AI candidate scoring without an enterprise implementation
Best for: Data-led in-house teams that will actually use hiring analytics to change their process, not just report on it
Best for: teams that want job posting, screening, structured interview scorecards and analytics in one pipeline, with a free plan for one user to test it on a real role
We are not going to rank ourselves against the products above. The useful thing we can offer instead is a free 1-user plan with no credit card, so you can run one real requisition end to end and judge it against your own process rather than against a feature table.
Looking for what this category does rather than which vendor to pick? How to evaluate AI recruiting tools.
Pitch N Hire is an applicant tracking system with a free 1-user plan. The fastest way to settle a comparison is to run one real role through it.
Free for 1 user · No credit card · Talk to a real hiring expert
A scripted demo tells you what a product can do. Running one real role through it tells you whether your team will actually use it. Pitch N Hire is free for 1 user, no credit card.
Prefer to talk? Book a demo · Talk to sales · View pricing
Free 1-user plan · No credit card · Talk to a real hiring expert
See your true cost-per-hire and how much Pitch N Hire could save you — our free Recruitment ROI Calculator gives you the numbers in under a minute. No signup required.
Open the free ROI calculatorPrefer a tailored walkthrough on your real roles? Drop your work email:
★ Free 1-user plan · No spam · Talk to a real hiring expert
Free 1-user plan · No credit card · Real person replies in 1 business day
