Pitch N Hire vs Manatal
Manatal is a Bangkok-founded, budget-friendly applicant tracking system that built its reputation on affordable per-user pricing and AI-assisted candidate recommendations. It is especially popular with recruitment agencies and small-to-mid-sized businesses that need to manage many roles cheaply, thanks to features like resume parsing, a candidate-enrichment engine that pulls in public social and professional data, and a browser sourcing extension for capturing profiles from LinkedIn and beyond. Its low entry cost and self-serve setup make it easy for a lean team to adopt without a procurement process. Pitch N Hire is an AI-native applicant tracking system that unifies sourcing, screening, and hiring decisions on one platform, with native async AI video interviews (Intuvos), a sourcing module (OnJob.io), and a free single-user tier. Both emphasize AI and affordability, but they differ in interview depth and who they're primarily built for.
Last updated
Free 1-user plan · No credit card · Talk to a real recruiter
Choose Pitch N Hire if you want native async AI video interviews, built-in sourcing, and a free single-user tier on one AI-native platform — especially for in-house hiring teams where automating the interview round saves the most time. Choose Manatal if you want an affordable, AI-assisted ATS with strong candidate enrichment, a browser sourcing extension, and very low per-user cost, particularly for agencies and SMBs running many roles at once. Both are AI-focused and budget-friendly; the decision hinges on interview depth versus low-cost, sourcing-led recruiting. Trial Manatal and start on Pitch N Hire's free tier to feel the difference on your own pipeline.
Where Pitch N Hire and Manatal differ, line by line.
| Capability | Pitch N Hire | Manatal |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Teams wanting native AI video interviews and screening in one ATS | Agencies and SMBs wanting an affordable, AI-assisted ATS |
| Pricing model | Free tier plus per-seat / per-job paid plans; sales-assisted | Accessible per-user monthly subscription; free trial |
| Free plan | Yes — 1 user free forever | No standing free tier; time-limited free trial |
| AI interviewing | Native async AI video interviews with structured scoring (Intuvos) | AI candidate recommendations and scoring; no native async AI video interview product |
| Candidate sourcing | Built-in sourcing module (OnJob.io) | Candidate enrichment, social-media sourcing, and resume parsing |
| Ease of setup | Guided, sales-assisted onboarding; quick start on free tier | Known for fast, self-serve setup at a low entry cost |
| Integrations | Core hiring-stack and job-board integrations; growing | Broad integrations including job boards, email, and a Chrome sourcing extension |
| Support | Sales-assisted onboarding and support | Self-serve resources plus support on paid plans |
| Sourcing extension / profile capture | Sourcing handled inside OnJob.io within the platform | Chrome extension for capturing and enriching profiles from social sites is a core draw |
| Affordability / per-seat cost | Free single-user entry, then per-seat / per-job tiers | Among the lowest per-user monthly costs in the ATS market |
| Target company size | Startups to mid-market in-house teams | SMBs and recruitment agencies |
Pricing is described by model, not by figure. Published per-seat and per-job prices change often, and a stale number on a comparison page is worse than no number — check each vendor's own pricing page before you decide.
Where each platform is stronger
Where Pitch N Hire stands out
Where Manatal stands out
When should you choose Pitch N Hire over Manatal?
Choose Pitch N Hire when the round that eats your time is the interview, not the sourcing. Manatal is excellent at finding and enriching candidates cheaply, but the actual evaluation still relies on recommendations and manual review. Pitch N Hire's Intuvos records async video interviews and scores them with structure, so a single recruiter can assess far more candidates consistently without booking live calls or chasing calendars.
It also suits in-house teams that want to prove value before paying. The free single-user tier has no trial clock, so you can run a full cycle — post, source with OnJob.io, screen with AI, and shortlist — at zero cost. If you are hiring for your own company rather than placing candidates for clients, that in-house, evaluation-first design tends to fit better than Manatal's agency-leaning, sourcing-first toolkit.
How do Manatal and Pitch N Hire differ on sourcing versus interviewing?
Manatal's center of gravity is discovery. The Chrome extension captures profiles from across the web, and the enrichment engine layers on public social and professional data automatically, which is exactly what a prospecting-heavy agency wants. Its AI helps by recommending and scoring applicants, but it stops short of running the interview itself.
Pitch N Hire's center of gravity is decision. Sourcing lives in OnJob.io, but the differentiator is native async AI video interviewing with structured scoring, turning the middle of the funnel into an automated, comparable step. So the two tools optimize different stages: Manatal makes finding and researching people cheap and fast, while Pitch N Hire makes evaluating and comparing them fast and consistent. Match the tool to whichever stage currently bottlenecks your hiring.
Comparing more tools?
Other comparisons
Choosing an ATS — answers
Related glossary terms
Choosing your recruiting stack
Pitch N Hire vs Manatal — FAQs
Is Pitch N Hire a good alternative to Manatal?
It can be, depending on your needs. Both are AI-focused and affordable, but Pitch N Hire adds native async AI video interviews with structured scoring, automating the interview round rather than just recommending candidates. Manatal is a strong, low-cost choice for agencies and SMBs that value candidate enrichment and social-media sourcing. If native AI interviewing and a free single-user tier matter most, Pitch N Hire is worth a close look; if affordable sourcing-led recruiting does, Manatal fits well.
How does pricing compare?
Both are positioned as affordable. Manatal uses accessible per-user monthly subscriptions with a free trial rather than a permanent free plan. Pitch N Hire offers a free tier (1 user free forever) plus per-seat and per-job paid plans with sales-assisted onboarding. For very small teams, both keep entry costs low; confirm current per-user numbers with each vendor, since pricing and plan structures change over time.
Which is better for recruitment agencies?
Manatal is purpose-built with agency-friendly features like candidate enrichment, social-media sourcing, and a Chrome extension at a low per-user cost, making it a popular agency choice. Pitch N Hire is oriented toward in-house hiring teams that want native AI video interviews and built-in sourcing, so it can work for agencies but is less tailored to placement-style workflows. Agencies prioritizing affordable, sourcing-led recruiting often find Manatal a closer match.
How does Manatal's candidate enrichment compare with Pitch N Hire's screening?
Manatal's enrichment engine automatically appends public social and professional data to a candidate profile, so recruiters spend less time researching each applicant before deciding to reach out. It answers 'who is this person?' quickly. Pitch N Hire's screening answers a different question — 'how did this person perform?' — through async AI video interviews with structured scoring. Enrichment enriches the top of the funnel; AI interviewing evaluates the middle. Sourcing-heavy agencies often value the former, while in-house teams facing volume often value the latter.
Does Manatal's Chrome sourcing extension have an equivalent in Pitch N Hire?
Manatal's browser extension is a headline feature: recruiters capture profiles directly from social and professional sites and pull them into the ATS with enriched data, which suits agency prospecting. Pitch N Hire keeps sourcing inside the platform through its OnJob.io module rather than a separate capture extension, so the workflow is more centralized but less oriented to on-the-fly profile grabbing across the open web. If your team lives in the browser hunting profiles, Manatal's extension is a real advantage worth weighing.
Which is more cost-effective for running many roles at once?
Manatal's per-user monthly model is among the lowest in the category, so scaling to many active roles and multiple recruiters stays inexpensive, which is a big reason agencies choose it. Pitch N Hire starts free for a single user and then moves to per-seat or per-job tiers; the value shifts toward what you get per role, including built-in AI interviewing that would otherwise be a separate purchase. For pure seat count at scale, price out both — Manatal often wins on raw per-user cost, Pitch N Hire on bundled AI capability.
Try Pitch N Hire on your own roles before you decide
Pitch N Hire is an applicant tracking system with a free 1-user plan. The fastest way to settle a comparison is to run one real role through it.
Free for 1 user · No credit card · Talk to a real hiring expert
See why teams pick Pitch N Hire over Manatal
Book a quick demo on your real roles and decide for yourself.
Prefer to talk? Book a demo Talk to sales View pricing
Free 1-user plan · No credit card · Talk to a real hiring expert
Judge it on your own roles, not on a table.
Bring the requisition you are running today and see both side by side. The free plan is free forever for one user, with no credit card.
