Cookies on this site

Strictly necessary cookies keep the site working. Our analytics and advertising tags — Microsoft Clarity and Google Tag Manager — stay switched off, and write no cookie, until you accept them. Privacy Policy

Zoho People vs Keka

Zoho People and Keka answer the same question in opposite ways. Zoho People is the HR platform inside a large software catalogue, where payroll and recruiting are separate Zoho products you add; Keka is a single Indian subscription that bundles core HR, payroll, attendance, performance and hiring together. The choice is between assembling a stack and buying one.

A company that already runs Zoho applications will look at Zoho People first, and a company shopping for an Indian HRMS on its own merits will usually reach Keka. Zoho People covers employee records, leave, attendance, timesheets, onboarding with e-signed offer letters, performance and compensation, a learning management system, an HR helpdesk with agents and service levels, engagement surveys and analytics, billed per user across named tiers from a free edition upward — and it integrates with Zoho Payroll and Zoho Recruit rather than including them. Keka bundles core HR, payroll with Indian statutory coverage, attendance, performance, hiring, expense and engagement into one subscription, and adds a professional-services automation module. So this is not really a feature comparison. It is a decision about how many products you want to own and how much you value one vendor's ecosystem.

Feature Zoho People Keka
Shape of the offer An HR platform inside a broad software catalogue, extended by adding sibling products A bundled suite where the modules arrive in one subscription
Payroll Not included — Zoho Payroll is a separate product that Zoho People integrates with Included, naming TDS, PF, ESIC, PT, LWF, Form 16 and Form 24Q in the core engine
Recruiting Not included — Zoho Recruit is a separate product Applicant tracking included, with job posting, pipelines, offer letters and a recruiter mobile app
Pricing model Per-user plans on monthly or yearly billing across named tiers, starting from a free edition A single subscription covering the bundled modules
Free option A free edition, and a paid trial that returns to the free edition when it ends Not described as a permanent free tier; evaluation is by demo and trial
Learning and HR helpdesk A learning management system and an HR helpdesk with dedicated agents and service-level handling Not the focus; engagement and performance are the adjacent modules
Timesheets and project time Timesheets for assigning and tracking work A professional-services automation module covering resource planning, project time, utilisation and billing
Ecosystem Integrates with Zoho Payroll, Zoho Recruit, Zoho Sign and Zoho Expense, plus Microsoft, Google and Zapier Connects to HRIS, payroll, CRM and collaboration tools around a single bundled core
Best fit Teams already standardised on Zoho, or those wanting HR administration with learning and a helpdesk included Indian companies wanting HR, payroll and hiring settled in one purchase

Where Zoho People stands out

  • ▸A free edition plus per-user tiers on monthly or yearly billing makes it unusually easy to start small and grow without a procurement exercise
  • ▸A learning management system and an HR helpdesk with dedicated agents and service-level handling are uncommon inclusions in an HR platform at this level
  • ▸Timesheets, engagement surveys, performance and compensation, onboarding with e-signed offer letters and analytics cover the administrative surface thoroughly
  • ▸For a company already running Zoho applications, the integrations with Zoho Payroll, Zoho Recruit, Zoho Sign and Zoho Expense turn separate purchases into a coherent stack
  • ▸It is sold internationally rather than as an India-only product, which suits a company with employees in more than one country

Where Keka stands out

  • ▸Payroll and hiring arrive with the platform rather than as additional products, so one purchase settles three needs that would otherwise be three subscriptions
  • ▸Indian statutory coverage is described concretely — TDS, PF, ESIC, PT, LWF, Form 16 and Form 24Q in the core payroll engine
  • ▸Attendance covers the messy cases Indian employers actually have: biometric devices, mobile clock-in, GPS capture, shift scheduling and rostering
  • ▸A professional-services automation module handles resource planning, project time, utilisation and billing for firms that sell their people's time
  • ▸Candidate data carries forward into HR, payroll and performance on the same record, which removes a re-entry step between hiring and the first payslip

Assembling a stack versus buying one

The cleanest way to read this comparison is as two philosophies of buying software. Zoho's is modular by design: each product does its job well, they integrate with one another, and you compose the stack you need. Zoho People covers employee records, leave, attendance, timesheets, onboarding, performance, learning and an HR helpdesk; Zoho Payroll pays people; Zoho Recruit hires them. For a company that likes choosing its own components and already runs Zoho elsewhere, this is a feature rather than a compromise, and the free edition lowers the cost of starting.

Keka's philosophy is the opposite. Bundling core HR, payroll, attendance, performance, hiring, expense and engagement into one subscription means fewer decisions, fewer contracts and one place where the employee record lives — which is why a candidate accepting an offer can flow into HR, payroll and performance without re-entry. The cost of that is less freedom to swap one layer out later. Neither philosophy is wrong; the mistake is comparing them as though a single Zoho People subscription and a Keka subscription buy the same outcome, because they do not.

Count the subscriptions, then compare

Because the two are packaged so differently, an honest cost comparison has to start by defining the outcome rather than the product. Write down what you actually need running in twelve months: employee records, leave and attendance, payroll for your entities, hiring, performance, and possibly learning or an internal HR helpdesk. Then price each scenario end to end. On the Zoho side that may mean Zoho People plus Zoho Payroll plus Zoho Recruit; on the Keka side it is likely one subscription, plus a separate tool for anything the bundle does not cover.

Then look past the licence line. Ask how many systems your HR team will log into during a normal week, how employee data moves between them, and what happens at year end when statutory outputs are due. A modular stack that integrates well can be excellent, and a bundle that covers everything unevenly can be worse than two focused products. The right answer follows from your own list, and any statutory element in it should be confirmed with a qualified payroll or tax advisor rather than taken from a vendor page or from this comparison.

Which should you choose?

Choose Zoho People if you are already invested in Zoho, or if you want HR administration with learning and an HR helpdesk included and are comfortable adding Zoho Payroll and Zoho Recruit as separate products when you need them. Choose Keka if you want payroll and hiring settled in the same purchase as core HR, want Indian statutory coverage described concretely, or run a project-based business that needs utilisation and billing. The mistake to avoid is comparing headline prices without counting subscriptions: Zoho People alone is not equivalent to Keka, because payroll and recruiting are separate products in Zoho's catalogue. Price the full scenario on both sides before deciding, and confirm statutory detail with a qualified advisor.

Considering an AI-native alternative?

One thing this comparison exposes is how often hiring gets bought by accident. Zoho People does onboarding but not recruiting — Zoho Recruit is the ATS — while Keka includes applicant tracking inside its bundle, and neither describes async video interviewing. Pitch N Hire does not compete with either as an HR system; it has no payroll, no attendance and no post-hire employee record. It is the hiring layer for teams whose constraint is applicant volume rather than administration, combining applicant tracking, async AI video interviews through Intuvos and sourcing through OnJob.io, with a free single-user plan to test the workflow first.

Other comparisons

HROne vs greytHRGreenhouse vs WorkableGreenhouse vs LeverWorkable vs Lever

See how Pitch N Hire compares

Pitch N Hire vs Zoho PeoplePitch N Hire vs KekaBest Keka alternatives

Choosing an ATS — answers

What is the best ATS for startups?How does an applicant tracking system work?What should I look for in an ATS?How much does an ATS cost?

Choosing your recruiting stack

Application managementEmployee data managementEmployee database softwarePayroll software in India
FAQ

Zoho People vs Keka — FAQs

Does Zoho People include payroll? +
No. Payroll is Zoho Payroll, a separate product that Zoho People integrates with, and Zoho People's own pages describe the relationship as an integration rather than an inclusion. Availability and statutory coverage vary by country, so confirm with Zoho which payroll edition applies to your entity and check current statutory rules with a qualified advisor before committing.
Does Zoho People include an applicant tracking system? +
No. Zoho's recruiting product is Zoho Recruit, sold separately. Zoho People handles onboarding once someone is hired, including offer letters with e-signature, which is easy to mistake for recruiting from the outside. Keka, by contrast, includes applicant tracking within its bundled subscription.
Which is cheaper? +
It depends entirely on how many products you need. Zoho People's per-user tiers start from a free edition and look inexpensive on their own, but a company needing HR administration plus payroll plus recruiting is buying three Zoho products. Keka bundles those needs into one subscription. Price the complete scenario on each side — every product, at your real headcount — rather than comparing entry prices.
Which suits an Indian company better? +
Keka is built around Indian payroll and describes the statutory items concretely in its core engine, which is a meaningful advantage if Indian compliance is central to the decision. Zoho People is sold internationally and handles HR administration well anywhere, with Indian payroll handled by the separate Zoho Payroll product. If you have employees in several countries, that international footing is worth weighing against Keka's Indian depth.
We already use Zoho CRM — does that settle it? +
It is a real argument but not a decisive one. Shared login patterns, consistent interfaces and native integrations across Zoho Payroll, Zoho Sign and Zoho Expense genuinely reduce friction, and that value compounds the more Zoho products you run. It should not, however, outweigh a payroll engine that fits your statutory reality better. Weight ecosystem convenience against payroll fit, and put payroll fit first if the two conflict.
Pitch N Hire ATS

Add Pitch N Hire to your shortlist

Pitch N Hire is an applicant tracking system with a free 1-user plan, built for recruiters and hiring teams that want one pipeline instead of several tools.

  • One pipeline for every role, applicant, and interview stage
  • Structured scorecards so the panel compares candidates on the same criteria
  • Careers page, job posting, and candidate communication in one place
Start free — 1 user Explore the ATS

Free for 1 user · No credit card · Talk to a real hiring expert

Built for recruiters & hiring teams

Still deciding between Zoho People and Keka?

See how an AI-native ATS compares on your real roles — start free, no credit card.

Prefer to talk? Book a demo · Talk to sales · View pricing

Free 1-user plan · No credit card · Talk to a real hiring expert

One Hiring Infrastructure.
Zero Tool Chaos.

Demos are consultative. We respect privacy and enterprise
governance. No lock-ins.

Start free Book demo