Loxo positions itself as a talent-intelligence platform that combines an applicant tracking system, a recruiting CRM, and AI-powered sourcing with built-in contact data — a stack built primarily for recruiting and staffing agencies. Agencies rely on it to manage client requisitions, source and enrich candidate contacts, and move placements through a pipeline inside one subscription tool. Of the sourcing-oriented products here, Loxo is the closest to a full ATS, though its workflows are shaped around agency placement rather than in-house hiring. Pitch N Hire is an AI-native ATS designed for internal recruiting teams: it pairs candidate management with native async AI video interviews (Intuvos) and OnJob.io sourcing, and offers a free single-user tier. This comparison helps you decide between an agency-first all-in-one and an AI-first ATS built around interviewing and in-house hiring workflows.
Free 1-user plan · No credit card · Talk to a real recruiter
| Feature | Pitch N Hire | Loxo |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | In-house SMB and growth teams wanting an AI-native ATS with interviews built in | Recruiting and staffing agencies wanting an all-in-one ATS, CRM, and sourcing stack |
| Pricing model | Transparent per-seat / per-job tiers and a free single-user plan | Subscription pricing arranged with sales; agency-oriented packaging |
| Free plan | Yes — 1 user free forever | No standing free plan; demo on request |
| AI interviewing | Built-in Intuvos async AI video interviews with structured scoring | No native async video interview product; relies on integrations |
| Candidate sourcing | Native sourcing via OnJob.io | Strong built-in AI sourcing and contact-data enrichment |
| Ease of setup | Sales-assisted onboarding for a fast start | Agency-focused setup; configuring the full CRM plus ATS takes some ramp |
| Integrations | Core HRIS and job-board integrations, growing steadily | Integrations plus its own sourcing and enrichment reduce reliance on outside tools |
| Support | Dedicated onboarding support, India-based, global coverage | Support with account management, geared to agency workflows |
| Structured hiring & scorecards | Structured, AI-assisted interview scoring built in | Placement-pipeline focused; lighter on interview scorecards than an in-house ATS |
| Analytics & reporting | Metrics oriented around the AI hiring funnel | Agency KPIs — placements, submittals, and client/candidate activity |
| Target company size | Startups to mid-market | Solo recruiters to mid-size staffing agencies |
Loxo is shaped by its agency roots. Recruiting and staffing firms need to manage client requisitions, source and enrich candidate contacts, and push placements through a pipeline that ties back to billing — and Loxo bundles ATS, CRM, and AI sourcing to do exactly that in one subscription. For an agency, that all-in-one design removes a lot of tool-switching and keeps client and candidate work in the same system.
Pitch N Hire is built for the other side of the market: in-house teams hiring for their own company. Its ATS, OnJob.io sourcing, and Intuvos async AI video interviews are organised around evaluating candidates and making internal hiring decisions rather than managing client placements. If you are an internal recruiting team — especially one that wants structured AI interviewing built in and a free way to start — Pitch N Hire maps more naturally to your process than an agency-first platform.
Sourcing is common ground. Loxo leans on built-in AI sourcing and contact-data enrichment to help agencies find and reach candidates quickly, and that capability, combined with its CRM, is a real strength for high-volume placement work. It is the most complete tool of this sourcing-oriented group, and for agencies it can genuinely reduce the number of separate systems in play.
Interviewing is where the platforms diverge most. Pitch N Hire treats structured async AI video interviews as a first-class feature through Intuvos, scoring candidates consistently inside the ATS, whereas Loxo's focus sits on sourcing, CRM, and placement rather than native interviewing. For a team that considers interviewing and standardised evaluation central to good hiring, that native capability — alongside integrated sourcing and a free single-user tier — is the clearest reason to choose Pitch N Hire over an agency-oriented all-in-one.
Choose Loxo if you run a recruiting or staffing agency and want an all-in-one ATS, CRM, and AI sourcing stack shaped around placements and client management. Choose Pitch N Hire if you are an in-house team that wants an AI-native ATS with native async AI video interviews and sourcing built in, plus a free single-user tier to start. Both are broad tools, but their audiences differ — Loxo leans agency, Pitch N Hire leans internal hiring with interviewing at its core.
Book a quick demo on your real roles and decide for yourself.
Prefer to talk? Book a demo · View pricing
Free 1-user plan · No credit card · Talk to a real hiring expert
See how Pitch N Hire automates sourcing, screening and AI interviews on your real roles. Start with your work email — no credit card.
★ Free 1-user plan · No spam · Talk to a real hiring expert
