Pitch N Hire vs Loxo
Loxo positions itself as a talent-intelligence platform that combines an applicant tracking system, a recruiting CRM, and AI-powered sourcing with built-in contact data — a stack built primarily for recruiting and staffing agencies. Agencies rely on it to manage client requisitions, source and enrich candidate contacts, and move placements through a pipeline inside one subscription tool. Of the sourcing-oriented products here, Loxo is the closest to a full ATS, though its workflows are shaped around agency placement rather than in-house hiring. Pitch N Hire is an AI-native ATS designed for internal recruiting teams: it pairs candidate management with native async AI video interviews (Intuvos) and OnJob.io sourcing, and offers a free single-user tier. This comparison helps you decide between an agency-first all-in-one and an AI-first ATS built around interviewing and in-house hiring workflows.
Free 1-user plan · No credit card · Talk to a real recruiter
Choose Loxo if you run a recruiting or staffing agency and want an all-in-one ATS, CRM, and AI sourcing stack shaped around placements and client management. Choose Pitch N Hire if you are an in-house team that wants an AI-native ATS with native async AI video interviews and sourcing built in, plus a free single-user tier to start. Both are broad tools, but their audiences differ — Loxo leans agency, Pitch N Hire leans internal hiring with interviewing at its core.
Where Pitch N Hire and Loxo differ, line by line.
| Capability | Pitch N Hire | Loxo |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | In-house SMB and growth teams wanting an AI-native ATS with interviews built in | Recruiting and staffing agencies wanting an all-in-one ATS, CRM, and sourcing stack |
| Pricing model | Transparent per-seat / per-job tiers and a free single-user plan | Subscription pricing arranged with sales; agency-oriented packaging |
| Free plan | Yes — 1 user free forever | No standing free plan; demo on request |
| AI interviewing | Built-in Intuvos async AI video interviews with structured scoring | No native async video interview product; relies on integrations |
| Candidate sourcing | Native sourcing via OnJob.io | Strong built-in AI sourcing and contact-data enrichment |
| Ease of setup | Sales-assisted onboarding for a fast start | Agency-focused setup; configuring the full CRM plus ATS takes some ramp |
| Integrations | Core HRIS and job-board integrations, growing steadily | Integrations plus its own sourcing and enrichment reduce reliance on outside tools |
| Support | Dedicated onboarding support, India-based, global coverage | Support with account management, geared to agency workflows |
| Structured hiring & scorecards | Structured, AI-assisted interview scoring built in | Placement-pipeline focused; lighter on interview scorecards than an in-house ATS |
| Analytics & reporting | Metrics oriented around the AI hiring funnel | Agency KPIs — placements, submittals, and client/candidate activity |
| Target company size | Startups to mid-market | Solo recruiters to mid-size staffing agencies |
Pricing is described by model, not by figure. Published per-seat and per-job prices change often, and a stale number on a comparison page is worse than no number — check each vendor's own pricing page before you decide.
Where each platform is stronger
Where Pitch N Hire stands out
Where Loxo stands out
Is Loxo or Pitch N Hire the right fit for how you hire?
Loxo is shaped by its agency roots. Recruiting and staffing firms need to manage client requisitions, source and enrich candidate contacts, and push placements through a pipeline that ties back to billing — and Loxo bundles ATS, CRM, and AI sourcing to do exactly that in one subscription. For an agency, that all-in-one design removes a lot of tool-switching and keeps client and candidate work in the same system.
Pitch N Hire is built for the other side of the market: in-house teams hiring for their own company. Its ATS, OnJob.io sourcing, and Intuvos async AI video interviews are organised around evaluating candidates and making internal hiring decisions rather than managing client placements. If you are an internal recruiting team — especially one that wants structured AI interviewing built in and a free way to start — Pitch N Hire maps more naturally to your process than an agency-first platform.
How do Loxo and Pitch N Hire approach sourcing and interviewing?
Sourcing is common ground. Loxo leans on built-in AI sourcing and contact-data enrichment to help agencies find and reach candidates quickly, and that capability, combined with its CRM, is a real strength for high-volume placement work. It is the most complete tool of this sourcing-oriented group, and for agencies it can genuinely reduce the number of separate systems in play.
Interviewing is where the platforms diverge most. Pitch N Hire treats structured async AI video interviews as a first-class feature through Intuvos, scoring candidates consistently inside the ATS, whereas Loxo's focus sits on sourcing, CRM, and placement rather than native interviewing. For a team that considers interviewing and standardised evaluation central to good hiring, that native capability — alongside integrated sourcing and a free single-user tier — is the clearest reason to choose Pitch N Hire over an agency-oriented all-in-one.
Comparing more tools?
Other comparisons
Choosing an ATS — answers
Related glossary terms
Choosing your recruiting stack
Pitch N Hire vs Loxo — FAQs
Is Pitch N Hire a good alternative to Loxo?
It depends on who you are. Loxo is built primarily for recruiting and staffing agencies, bundling ATS, CRM, and sourcing for placement work. Pitch N Hire is an AI-native ATS built for in-house hiring teams, with native async AI video interviews and a free tier. Agencies may prefer Loxo's placement-centric stack, while internal recruiting teams that want AI interviewing built in usually find Pitch N Hire the better fit.
Is Loxo an ATS or a sourcing tool?
Both — Loxo describes itself as a talent-intelligence platform that combines an ATS, a CRM, and AI sourcing, which makes it the most ATS-like tool in this group. Its workflows, however, are shaped around agency placements rather than internal hiring. Pitch N Hire is also a full ATS, but designed around in-house recruiting and structured interviewing rather than client-and-candidate agency billing.
Does Loxo include AI video interviews like Intuvos?
Loxo's strengths are sourcing, contact data, and its recruiting CRM rather than native interviewing, so async AI video interviews are not a core feature the way they are in Pitch N Hire. Intuvos lets Pitch N Hire users send structured video interviews and score responses consistently inside the ATS. If interviewing is central to your process, that native capability is a meaningful difference.
How does pricing compare?
Loxo uses a subscription model arranged with its sales team and packaged around agency use, so pricing depends on your configuration. Pitch N Hire publishes transparent per-seat and per-job tiers and includes a free single-user plan, which lowers the barrier for startups and small in-house teams. The right value comparison depends heavily on whether you are an agency or an internal team.
Which is better for an in-house recruiting team?
An in-house team is usually better served by Pitch N Hire, because its ATS, AI interviews, and sourcing are built for internal hiring workflows and it offers a free way to start. Loxo is excellent for agencies that need CRM depth and placement pipelines. The deciding factor is your model: agency placement points to Loxo, in-house hiring points to Pitch N Hire.
Try Pitch N Hire on your own roles before you decide
Pitch N Hire is an applicant tracking system with a free 1-user plan. The fastest way to settle a comparison is to run one real role through it.
Free for 1 user · No credit card · Talk to a real hiring expert
See why teams pick Pitch N Hire over Loxo
Book a quick demo on your real roles and decide for yourself.
Prefer to talk? Book a demo Talk to sales View pricing
Free 1-user plan · No credit card · Talk to a real hiring expert
Judge it on your own roles, not on a table.
Bring the requisition you are running today and see both side by side. The free plan is free forever for one user, with no credit card.
