CEIPAL ATS vs Pitch N Hire: Which ATS Works Best for Your Business?

Recruitment has changed dramatically over the past decade. With the modern shift toward remote work, increased competition for top talent, and an emphasis on diversity hiring, recruiters now face challenges that require smarter tools. That’s where applicant tracking systems (ATS) come in.

Among the many ATS solutions, two names often come up: CEIPAL ATS and Pitch N Hire. While both platforms promise to streamline recruitment, there’s a clear difference in user experience, pricing flexibility, and innovation. And if you’re a growing company or a recruitment agency, making the wrong choice could mean wasted time, lower productivity, and missed opportunities.

In this blog post, we’ll do a head-to-head comparison of CEIPAL ATS and Pitch N Hire, including a feature/pricing table, real-world case studies of businesses switching, and a detailed comparison of Pitch N Hire & CEIPAL ATS. By the end, you’ll know which ATS actually delivers the best value for your hiring needs.

💡 Quick Note:
If you’re ready to transform your hiring process, Pitch N Hire offers an AI-powered ATS & Interview Automation Platform to streamline recruitment, cut time-to-hire, and deliver top talent faster. Book your free demo here and see the difference in action.

To learn more about the applicant tracking system (ATS) software, click here : Best Applicant Tracking System

Why Choosing the Right ATS Matters

All-in-one Hiring OS

Free AI Powered ATS
& Interview Solutions

Revolutionizing Interviews, Hiring,
and Job Opportunities

Grab the deal

All-in-one Hiring OS

Free AI Powered ATS & Interview Solutions

Revolutionizing Interviews, Hiring, and Job Opportunities

Grab the deal

Recruitment is one of the most expensive and time-consuming business functions. Studies show an average bad hire can cost you more than 30% of that employee’s first-year earnings. But here’s the good news: a powerful applicant tracking system can cut time-to-hire by up to 50% and improve candidate quality.

The Anatomy of a Good ATS

A reliable ATS should:

Post jobs across multiple boards simultaneously

Help screen candidates efficiently

Provide a great candidate experience

Automate communication like emails and reminders

Offer analytics for smarter hiring decisions

Scale alongside your growth

Not every ATS hits this checklist. That’s why comparing solutions like Pitch N Hire vs CEIPAL ATS isn’t just about features—it’s about which platform actually helps recruiters deliver results.

If you want to understand how an ATS can improve your hiring process? Click Here : best ats software

Head-to-Head Feature and Pricing Comparison

Here’s a straightforward table that compares CEIPAL ATS and Pitch N Hire on key features and pricing.

Take your hiring to the next level with ATS software. Click here : Applicant tracking system ats software 
 

It’s clear from the table that while CEIPAL ATS is functional, Pitch N Hire offers stronger usability, flexibility, and forward-thinking features—especially for businesses scaling quickly.

Case Studies: Real Companies Switching from CEIPAL ATS to Pitch N Hire

Nothing speaks louder than real-world experiences. Let’s look at a couple of businesses that made the leap from CEIPAL ATS to Pitch N Hire.

Case Study 1: A Mid-Sized Tech Company

Challenge with CEIPAL ATS: The recruitment team found the platform overly complex, with too many clicks required for simple actions. They also struggled with reporting customization.

Switch to Pitch N Hire: After migrating, they reported saving 10+ hours weekly on manual tasks, better pipeline visibility, and much higher recruiter satisfaction.

Case Study 2: A Staffing Agency

Challenge with CEIPAL ATS: Cost escalations became difficult to justify as the agency scaled rapidly. Recruiters also reported that candidate portals were slow to load.

Switch to Pitch N Hire: The agency was impressed with the simple pricing structure, mobile-first candidate experience, and AI-driven ranking that helped prioritize the best candidates. Productivity increased by 35% in the first quarter.

Key Takeaway: In both cases, Pitch N Hire provided a smoother, faster, and more cost-effective recruitment process.

To learn more about the pricing of our ATS software, click here : cost of applicant tracking system

Comparison of Pitch N Hire & CEIPAL ATS

When recruiters ask which platform to choose, the discussion sually comes down to these factors: usability, features, pricing, and support. Let’s break it down.

Usability

CEIPAL ATS: Functional, but users often describe the interface as cluttered and requiring a steeper learning curve.

Pitch N Hire: Modern, easy-to-navigate design that new users can adopt quickly with minimal training.

Features

CEIPAL ATS: Provides job postings, automation, integrations, and analytics. However, the features are more traditional.

Pitch N Hire: Goes beyond basics by offering AI-driven recommendations, better candidate matching, and advanced pipeline analytics.

Pricing

CEIPAL ATS: Tiered subscriptions that can get costly as recruiters or job volumes increase.

Pitch N Hire: Transparent pricing that adapts to both small startups and large enterprises, offering excellent value for money.
 

Discover the benefits of using an ATS—click here to learn more: top ats system

Support

CEIPAL ATS: Mixed feedback, with some users facing delays in getting issues resolved.

Pitch N Hire: 24/7 live chat support plus dedicated account managers who guide recruiters through setup and scaling.

Verdict: If you’re looking for long-term scalability, more intuitive tools, and better support, Pitch N Hire clearly outshines CEIPAL ATS.

Additional Insights for Recruiters Choosing an ATS

So, how do you pick the ATS that aligns with your long-term hiring goals? Here are some actionable insights:

Look Beyond Features—Focus on Adoption

A tool with hundreds of fancy features won’t help if your recruiters find it confusing. Simplicity and ease of adoption should be top priorities.

Evaluate Support Responsiveness

Recruitment doesn’t wait. Delays in customer support can impact your time-to-fill positions. Always test vendor response times before committing.

Transparency in Pricing

Scalability matters. Many companies underestimate the importance of predictable pricing. Go for a model that grows with your team without unexpected jumps.

Candidate Experience is Non-Negotiable

Remember: your ATS doesn’t just affect your recruiters—it’s also the first impression candidates get of your company. A bad portal can turn away top talent.

Pitch N Hire focuses heavily on candidate experience with mobile-optimized forms and automated updates, whereas CEIPAL ATS falls shorter in this area.

Learn more about our powerful hr ats systems and how it can transform your recruitment process.

FAQ Section

Is CEIPAL ATS good for small businesses?

CEIPAL ATS can work for small businesses, but many report it being more suited for enterprises due to its complexity and higher cost tiers. For startups and smaller teams, Pitch N Hire tends to be a better fit.

Which ATS offers more affordable pricing?

Pitch N Hire generally offers more flexible and cost-effective pricing options compared to CEIPAL ATS, especially for growing companies or recruitment agencies.

How easy is it to switch from CEIPAL ATS to Pitch N Hire?

The transition is smoother than most expect. Pitch N Hire provides dedicated migration support, helping recruiters transfer data without downtime.

Does CEIPAL ATS provide AI-driven candidate matching?

Yes, CEIPAL ATS does have automation, but its AI-driven candidate ranking is not as advanced as what Pitch N Hire currently offers.

Which is better for candidate experience: CEIPAL ATS or Pitch N Hire?

Pitch N Hire stands out with its seamless, mobile-friendly portals and automated updates, giving candidates a better application journey.

Want to understand how an ATS can improve your hiring process? Click here : Ats Software Price

Conclusion

Choosing between CEIPAL ATS and Pitch N Hire ultimately comes down to business needs, user experience, and total value. While both solutions provide functionality, Pitch N Hire consistently outperforms CEIPAL ATS in usability, pricing flexibility, advanced automation, and customer support.

If your goal is to speed up hiring, delight candidates, and give your recruiters tools they’ll actually enjoy using, Pitch N Hire is the smarter long-term investment.


Want a better applicant tracking solution than CEIPAL ATS? Compare the market’s top ATS platforms here:"
iCIMS ATS                                       Lever ATS
Workday Recruiting ATS                Greenhouse ATS
BambooHr ATS                              Workable ATS
Zoho Recruit ATS                           Ismart Recruit ATS
Expertia AI ATS