-->
Written By: Pitch N Hire
Wed Aug 27 2025
5 min read
The recruitment landscape has changed dramatically over the past decade. Companies no longer rely on just job boards or referrals—they need robust tools to manage hundreds (sometimes thousands) of applications. That's where Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) come in, helping HR teams streamline hiring by centralizing candidate data, automating communication, and improving collaboration among recruiters and hiring managers.
Among the growing number of ATS solutions, Pyjama HR ATS and Pitch N Hire stand out as two popular choices for businesses of different sizes. But which of these tools truly delivers the best results? In this post, we'll do a head-to-head comparison of Pyjama HR ATS vs. Pitch N Hire, explore customer case studies, analyze features, and look into pricing to help you make the right decision for your organization. Towards the end, we'll also highlight why many companies are switching from competitors like Ceipal ATS to Pitch N Hire.
To learn more about the applicant tracking system (ATS) software, click here : Best Applicant Tracking System
Your ATS can make or break your recruitment process. The wrong system might slow your team down, frustrate candidates, and create compliance risks. On the other hand, the right software can:
Investing in the right tool is more than just about saving time—it's about attracting and securing top talent before competitors do.
To make things easier, let's compare Pyjama HR ATS and Pitch N Hire side by side across major categories like features, usability, customer support, and pricing.
To learn more about the pricing of our ATS software, click here : cost of applicant tracking system
Feature/Category | Pyjama HR ATS | Pitch N Hire |
---|---|---|
User Interface | Functional but slightly outdated UI | Modern, intuitive, mobile-friendly UI |
Job Posting | Standard multi-platform posting | Advanced posting with customizable branding options |
Candidate Evaluation | Basic resume parsing | Smart AI-driven candidate scoring |
Collaboration Tools | Limited team collaboration features | Built-in chat, tagging, and shared notes for teams |
Interview Scheduling | Manual scheduling only | Automated interview scheduling & calendar sync |
Reporting/Analytics | Basic dashboards and reports | Advanced analytics, custom reporting, and funnel insights |
Integrations | Limited integrations with job boards | Wide range of third-party integrations (Slack, LinkedIn, Gmail, CRM tools) |
Pricing | Budget-friendly basic plans | Competitive pricing with more advanced features |
Customer Support | Email support with moderate response times | 24/7 multichannel support with quick turnaround |
Scalability | Suitable for small businesses | Flexible for startups, SMEs, and enterprise needs |
Several organizations have switched from Pyjama HR ATS—or even Ceipal ATS—to Pitch N Hire due to its more advanced features. Let's look at a few real-world scenarios:
A fast-paced fintech startup initially chose Pyjama HR ATS for its affordability. As the team grew from 20 to 200 employees within two years, they realized the Pyjama HR ATS system lacked flexibility in reporting and integrations. After migrating to Pitch N Hire, they benefited from advanced analytics that showed which job boards were bringing in the best candidates, cutting their hiring costs by nearly 30%.
A mid-sized IT firm was using Ceipal ATS but faced challenges with collaboration and candidate engagement. Before considering Pyjama HR ATS, they evaluated multiple solutions and found that recruiters found most platforms clunky and candidates often complained about poor communication. After switching to Pitch N Hire, interview scheduling was automated, team collaboration improved, and candidate NPS scores went up dramatically.
A staffing agency was looking for a tool that allowed team-wide collaboration while maintaining brand consistency across client accounts. They first tried Pyjama HR ATS, but the lack of advanced customization in the Pyjama HR ATS platform limited their client relationships. Pitch N Hire, on the other hand, gave them CRM-style features alongside ATS functionality, helping them win repeat business.
If you want to understand how an ATS can improve your hiring process? Click here : best ats software
While Pyjama HR ATS offers the basics, many recruiters find the Pyjama HR ATS interface outdated and lacking modern design elements. Pitch N Hire's modern dashboards, ease of navigation, and responsive design make it easier for recruiters to work efficiently—especially useful for hiring managers working on the go. Companies evaluating Pyjama HR ATS often cite the user interface as a key limitation.
Pitch N Hire shines in candidate experience. From automated emails to self-scheduling interviews, candidates feel engaged throughout the hiring journey. Pyjama HR ATS lacks these refinements, which can impact employer branding. Organizations using Pyjama HR ATS frequently report candidate complaints about communication gaps during the recruitment process.
Take your hiring to the next level with ATS software. Click here : Applicant tracking system ats software
Analytics & Reporting
Recruiters depend on data to make informed decisions. Pitch N Hire provides deep insights like source-of-hire reports, time-to-fill trends, and recruiter productivity dashboards. Pyjama HR ATS, on the other hand, only offers surface-level reports. The limited analytics capabilities in Pyjama HR ATS often force HR teams to maintain separate spreadsheets for detailed reporting.
In today's tech stack-heavy environment, integration is key. Pitch N Hire has integrations with job boards, CRMs, and communication tools like Slack and Gmail. Pyjama HR ATS is more limited in its integration capabilities and better suited for entry-level setups. Companies outgrowing Pyjama HR ATS often struggle with the platform's scalability limitations.
Learn more about our powerful top ats system and how it can transform your recruitment process.
When evaluating Pyjama HR ATS, organizations should consider several factors:
Although not at the core of this Pyjama HR ATS comparison, it's worth addressing. Ceipal ATS has been popular among some mid-sized companies but has gained criticism for clunky UX and limited customer support responsiveness. Many HR teams migrating from either Pyjama HR ATS or Ceipal to Pitch N Hire report:
In nearly every metric, Pitch N Hire provides a more future-proof solution compared to both Pyjama HR ATS and Ceipal ATS.
Click here : hr ats systems to see how applicant tracking systems simplify recruitment.
If you're still on the fence between Pyjama HR ATS and Pitch N Hire (or considering other ATS platforms), here are some actionable tips:
Pyjama HR ATS is best for small businesses or startups that want a budget-friendly entry-level ATS without too many advanced features. However, companies should evaluate whether Pyjama HR ATS capabilities will meet their long-term needs.
Companies are switching from Pyjama HR ATS because Pitch N Hire offers better collaboration tools, more integrations, automated interview scheduling, and stronger analytics—features needed for modern, fast-paced hiring that Pyjama HR ATS currently lacks.
Pitch N Hire generally provides a more intuitive user experience, faster customer support, and more robust features compared to both Ceipal ATS and Pyjama HR ATS, making it a preferred choice for scaling businesses.
Yes, with CRM-style features and multi-client account management, it's ideal for recruitment or staffing agencies looking to streamline their workflows while maintaining brand consistency. This is an area where Pyjama HR ATS falls short.
While Pitch N Hire may cost slightly more than Pyjama HR ATS, most users find the productivity and efficiency gains far outweigh the price difference. The Pyjama HR ATS cost savings often disappear when factoring in additional tools needed to supplement its limitations.
Both Pyjama HR ATS and Pitch N Hire provide useful solutions for digitizing recruitment processes, but the two platforms serve different audiences. Pyjama HR ATS works well for small businesses just getting started, but organizations should carefully evaluate whether Pyjama HR ATS will meet their future needs.
However, Pitch N Hire offers a far more comprehensive suite of tools—automation, analytics, integrations, and scalability—that make it the clear choice for companies intent on growth. For businesses currently using Pyjama HR ATS and experiencing limitations, Pitch N Hire emerges as the logical upgrade path.
For businesses dissatisfied with platforms like Pyjama HR ATS or Ceipal ATS, Pitch N Hire also emerges as a smoother, more modern alternative with excellent customer feedback.
Bottom line: If you're looking for long-term efficiency, better candidate engagement, and advanced recruiting features, upgrading from Pyjama HR ATS to Pitch N Hire is the smart choice for growing organizations.
Explore the best ATS solutions on the market. Compare Pyjama HR ATS with top alternatives like:
iCIMS ATS Lever ATS
Workday Recruiting ATS Greenhouse ATS
BambooHr ATS Workable ATS
Zoho Recruit ATS Ismart Recruit ATS
Expertia AI ATS CEIPAL ATS